Home | A New Approach | Specific Up C Techniques | Other Techniques
OTHER TECHNIQUES
There are some other ‘listed’ upper cervical
techniques, which I will mention here however, I do not know enough about
these techniques to begin to explain them. Where I have managed to find
some information I have provided it here in summary with the appropriate
sources. A few techniques are not solely upper cervical and include full
spine procedures. I would hope at some stage to gather more detailed
information, including whether or not they are still practised as originally
developed or in some modified or new form and add them as separate pages
to the UpC techniques section of my website. Some of these have their
place in the history of upper cervical chiropractic development and are
the forerunner for many of the UpC techniques available today.
For a list of many chiropractic techniques I refer you to the following
URLs. Hopefully you won’t be too confused! I think this is another
issue with chiropractic in general which needs to be addressed as a matter
of urgency. We need well thought out research to determine the best technique
or combination of techniques, which are most effective at restoring health
for patients.
http://www.nsirtech.com/technique_list.html
1. Atlas Specific Founder: A.A. Wernsing, (deceased)
According to Don Harrison, PhD, DC, MSE; Origins of CBP Technique: Part
I; Source: http://www.idealspine.com/
"
A.A. Wernsing, DC, graduated from Palmer College (School) of Chiropractic
in 1926. After graduation in 1926 from Palmer School of Chiropractic,
Dr. Wernsing opened a practice in Hollywood, California. During the depression
(1930), he stated that so few patients came in to his office that he
had considerable time to analyze their problems. He originated the nasium
radiographic view in 1930 as a means to exactly determine the location
of the atlas vertebra in relation to the skull. He originated the atlas
plane line now used in all upper cervical techniques and he was the first
to measure atlas displacements in degrees. Dr. Wernsing termed his new
technique "Atlas Specific".
He originated what is now termed the "triceps pull" upper cervical
adjustment for C1 displacements in 1930. In 1933, he originated the side
posture-adjusting table with variable headpiece, before a modified version
was used in Grostic and NUCCA techniques. Grostic, NUCCA, Pettibon, Orthospinology,
HIO, and Atlas Orthogonal are all derived from Wernsing’s Atlas
Specific Technique, however, there are clear differences.”
"Dr. Gregory
had been reading Dr. A. A. Wernsing's The Atlas Specific about this time
and was impressed by Wernsing's comment-due to the shape of the superior
articular facets of the atlas, the atlas moves laterally as if on the
rim of circle-" (1941). He showed the Wernsing book to Dr. Grostic,
the axis superior articulations were added, and the condylar-axial concept
became the starting point for what was to become the Grostic Technique.”
It is clear from these two references that Wernsing was responsible
for the early development of analysis and correction of upper cervical
subluxations.
He appears to be another early pioneer of ‘specific’ upper
cervical chiropractic. His work has manifested itself in many of the
existing upper cervical techniques.
2. Sutter Upper Cervical Technique Founder: Max and Ted Sutter (Ret.)
"Dr.
Ted Sutter (ret.) personally knew Dr. A.A. Wernsing because of Dr. Wernsing's
chiropractic relationship with Ted's dad, Dr. Max Sutter. Wernsing and
Sutter spent time together in their quest for upper cervical specific
work. Eventually Dr. Sutter developed another UpC technique that he,
then his son Ted, practiced for two generations with tremendous results.
Dr. Max Sutter's research on the anatomy of the spine and the possible
mechanical movements of each vertebra were in basic agreement with Dr.
A.A. Wernsing. Sutter’s research convinced him that the atlas could
not rotate on the condyles without causing separation of the joint surfaces.
He felt that the significant subluxations were laterality and inferiority/superiority
of the atlas relative to the condyles of the occiput. Of course inferiority
actually came from posterior movement of the atlas on the condyles just
as superiority came from anterior movement of the atlas on the condyles.”
Dr. Sutter, in adjusting, "believed in using a light toggle with
a thumb contact on the transverse process. It was quick and not deep
and with an almost instant release. The objective was to supply help
to innate as needed, but also to allow Innate the opportunity to not
use the force if it was not needed. He felt he had less need to worry
about over adjusting.”
|